- Read more: Guardrail the Judicial Mind: Preserving the Cognitive Integrity of Judges in the Era of LLMs
This paper examines the emerging threat to judicial cognitive integrity posed by the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as preparatory tools in judicial decision-making. Drawing on established psychological and behavioural research, it argues that judges’ interaction with LLM outputs predictably generates automation bias and cognitive offloading, subtly shaping reasoning even where judges remain formally…
- Read more: Judging by AI: Compromised Independence and a Threat to Human Rights?
This paper aims to uncover the potentials and perils of artificial judicial decision-making and focuses particularly on the risk of compromised independence of the judiciary and the possible impacts on human rights through the integration of AI in the judicial decision-making process. It concludes that modern AI tech tools have the potential to play assistive,…
